![]() |
![]() |
Catholic church vs saviour of childless
The Times Higher Education
Supplement (London)
October 6 2000
Domenico Pacitti
In Italy, the pope wants to restrict human fertility treatment, but UK researchers have found that relationships in donor and IVF families are unusually strong
SEVERINO
Antinori, Italy's charismatic pioneer of medically assisted reproduction and
godsend to the country's estimated 18 per cent of sterile couples, is fighting
for survival.
Antinori,
55, has been christened by the national press "the miracle father of
impossible children", but the Roman Catholic church feels that this is
one miracle it can do without.
Vatican
pressure for stringent measures on fertility treatments could force Antinori
to close shop and emigrate, continuing the tradition of Italy's top
scientists, including Nobel laureates Rita Levi Montalcini and Renato
Dulbecco.
A
church-backed bill has just been blocked by a surprise vote after a battle in
the Italian parliament, but Italy's rightwing, which is favourite to gain
power next year, says it will press for legislation on the basis of the same
bill after the elections.
At
the infertility unit of Antinori's international research centre, just 500
yards from St Peter's in Rome, baroque paintings in the luxurious reception
portray winged cupids, wistful maidens, madonna-like matrons and chubby-faced
children. A plaque from one of his 2,000-plus satisfied couples expresses
eternal gratitude to the "caro professore" for turning a dream into
reality; another warns patients that though the centre boasts good results, it
does not perform miracles.
Antinori's
clients, many of whom are British, come from all walks of life. Some are top
international names in sport, cinema and world affairs. He was even approached
once, he relates, by a handsome 39-year-old gentleman with a zero sperm count
(azoospermia), who turned out to be a Catholic priest. The man later phoned to
cancel his appointment and was never seen again.
But
now "the miracle father" is fuming and seeking international
support. "This is a law aimed not just against progress but against
humanity itself. It is based on a fundamentalist religious ideal that is even
more dangerous than that of the Ayatollah Khomenei. This is not just
obscurantism in the face of the pursuit of truth - it is an inquisition."
Antinori
warmly acknowledges the support of the British medical world during his years
of persecution by the Vatican. "For four years, they tried to crucify me
with an avalanche of libel and slander - and all because these people demand
absolute power over man and science. In Italy we have the Roman Catholic
church, which persecuted Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei. Basically nothing
has changed since then - it's just that nowadays they do it differently. The
situation cannot be allowed to go on."
Trouble
began in 1986 when Antinori started experimenting on sperm injection
techniques in cases of male infertility. The news produced a wave of
defamatory statements against him in the Catholic press. He raised three legal
actions, won them all and will donate the proceeds to the scientific
community. His persecution by the church is, he argues, an implicit
condemnation of all researchers who try to work freely and objectively. For
him, the latest Vatican move for legislation could be the last straw.
Italy
has no national legislation on fertility treatments. It relies mainly on
regulations laid down by the Italian medical association's code of ethics,
which were last updated in 1994. But Pope John Paul II is pressing for the
introduction of laws to regulate medically assisted human procreation.
The
proposed legislation sanctions in vitro fertilisation in Italy under a
licensing and monitoring system that seeks to protect the rights of all
involved, "especially those of the conceived". It is said to be
inspired by the British Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority model.
The
bill states that no more than three cells may be fertilised in vitro and they
must be transferred into the womb simultaneously. In Britain, the HFEA limits
the transfer of embryos to a maximum of three to avoid multiple births, but
there is no limit on the number of cells that may be fertilised. Antinori,
whose clinic has a low percentage of multiple births, says fertilising fewer
than eight cells would cut his 30 per cent pregnancy success rate to as little
as 3 per cent.
The
bill's limitation of fertility treatment to women "of a potentially
fertile age" would also exclude menopausal subjects, an area in which
Antinori has been a pioneer. In 1989, Antinori's patient Paola R. became the
first menopausal woman in history to give birth, after a donor egg implant.
Since then Antinori has helped about 80 women over the age of 50, in advanced
menopause, to "realise their impossible dream". Among them was
Rosanna Giorgi Della Corte, 63, who in 1994 became the oldest woman to give
birth.
In
addition, both surrogacy and the use of third-party donor sperm and eggs would
be outlawed by the bill. In Britain the HFEA last year approved the first bulk
import of sperm from Denmark to meet growing needs, having lifted the ban on
paid egg-sharing a year earlier. HFEA chairwoman Ruth Deech has said that a
culture of altruism in sperm and egg donors should be encouraged. "Again
you see that here in Italy we are in the dark ages compared with countries
such as Britain," Antinori says. "What is it if not an act of love
to help a woman with no uterus? Although our church preaches a lot about love,
it seems to have little understanding of such matters."
Finally,
the bill's prohibition of all experiments on individual human embryos would,
Antinori argues, kill the field of assisted reproduction in Italy stone dead.
Antinori supports human cell nucleus replacement, or cloning, for the
therapeutic help it could provide in the treatment of cancers and of
Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases. He also supports the cloning of sperm in
cases of azoospermia, but he opposes the cloning of human organs.
The
proposed legislation would impose severe penalties on doctors, including from
ten to 20 years in prison and fines from Pounds 50,000. Neither
"parent" involved in illegal use of third-party donor sperm or eggs
would be able to disclaim legal parenthood.
In
its present form, the bill could face challenges on the grounds that it unduly
limits freedom and fails to give an adequate legal definition of a potentially
fertile age and of those legal persons whose rights are being protected.
Should it become law, recourse to the Italian constitutional court would be
almost automatic.
Some
have already resorted to the courts. Earlier this year, a Rome doctor,
Pasquale Bilotta, won an appeal in a case brought against him by the national
medical association for using egg-sharing treatment. The association says it
will present a counter-appeal at the Supreme Court. And a doctor in Pavia,
Cesare Galli, who recently had his cloned bull confiscated by police and his
laboratory placed under sequester, is reportedly also taking legal action.
Antinori,
who despite international recognition and a string of respected publications,
has been unable to secure a tenured post, is scathing about the state of
university research. "Mine is a cry of distress because the cream of
Italy's scientists are forced to go abroad. The mechanisms that characterise
the Italian university system and research need to be changed completely by
sweeping away the whole bureaucratic, administrative and religious world.
There is always this religious spectre behind everything in Italy."
So
disillusioned has Antinori become with politicians that he founded a political
movement, Autonomia Liberale, which won an encouraging 8,000 votes at local
elections in Lazio. He is backed by other radical freedom-fighters such as
Antonio Di Pietro, the "clean hands" magistrate-turned-politician.
So
far as the threat to his fertility work goes, the first round has gone better
for him than expected. But the reappearance of former Christian Democrat prime
minister Giulio Andreotti as a guiding force to Italy's Catholic politicians
promises a fiercer battle ahead.
Meanwhile,
the pope, who insists that the suppression of a human cell's "right to
life" is fundamentally immoral, concluded his jubilee speech to an
audience of 7,000 international academics last month with the statement that
moral demands based on an awareness of the limits of science are not
obscurantist.
Italy's
miracle father is putting up the fight of his life, but he may need something
of a miracle if he is to withstand the crushing power of the holy Vatican.
International Associated Research Centre for Human Reproduction, Italy: www.raprui.it/home_i.html; The Vatican: www.vatican.va/